Strategies for increased social justice in urban planning and local governance
Climate change and social inequalities affect urban life, in particular marginalised groups. Traditional participatory approaches in urban planning and local governance solutions often fail to create just inclusion of people who need it the most.
Based on the results from seven DUT projects, authors recommend that municipalities make three key shifts to achieve social justice in urban planning and local governance:
1. Make participation accessible and re-balance power
Due to efficiency reasons, current urban planning and local governance often prioritise technical knowledge over the local expertise and lived experience of city dwellers. Conventional participation methods can be inaccessible and favour certain demographic groups over others.
Recommendations
- Value local knowledge and lived experience: treat city dwellers and grassroots groups as the true experts of their own neighbourhoods. Incorporate the different community needs, objectives and perspectives when defining priorities and implementing solutions.
- Know your grassroots initiatives: actively map and make an inventory of grassroots initiatives and their spaces. Provide space and resources for these existing community innovations without taking them over. This can be supported by creating a dedicated municipal role with a specific focus on civic engagement.
- Use intermediaries as facilitators: work with well-connected and knowledgeable ambassadors from the neighbourhoods, such as neighbourhood associations.
A good facilitator creates space for different perspectives, connects local initiatives with local governments, translates technical jargon and regulatory constraints into accessible language, and ensures powerful voices do not drown out the marginalised.
4. Remove barriers: public does not mean accessible. Use fun activities, low-tech digital tools, and varied meeting times to reach people who cannot attend. Create participatory spaces and mechanisms that make it easy for citizens to understand local governance and policymaking.
2. Build diverse networks and embrace conflict
Standard consultation often reaches the usual suspects and avoids the difficult conversations. Therefore, municipalities should proactively work with local networks.
Recommendations
- Broaden the stakeholder table: actively recruit social enterprises, grassroots groups, and those organisations focused on social justice. Certain groups might be repeatedly sidelined, despite having a stake in the process. Ask yourself and those already present: who is missing in this room?
- The staircase approach: for complex initiatives, start with one-on-one interviews, move to group-specific interviews (e.g. just politicians or just NGOs), and finish with joint workshops where multiple groups negotiate on equal footing.
- Welcome a healthy dose of conflict: Tension and friction are to be expected and can actually lead to mutual learning and better, more robust solutions if managed transparently.
Engage with diverse opinions and give space for disagreement. Hold dedicated workshops that facilitate convergence towards a shared collective vision.
3. Turn input into action
Even highly inclusive participatory processes can fail if the outcomes are not structurally implemented, leading to broken promises and community frustration.
Recommendations
- Align with policy timelines: schedule engagement so that the results are ready when a policy is being written or a budget is being set.
- Set clear boundaries and roles:
Be transparent about what is possible with regards to budget, timelines, and regulatory constraints and what is not. This prevents city dwellers and groups from feeling like their time was wasted on things that cannot be changed.
3. Build networks: establish dedicated spaces and moments for continuous communication and learning between grassroots initiatives, community groups, and public authorities, ensuring local expertise is valued and actively used to shape urban solutions.
Practice recommendations
This publication is an output from the DUT Knowledge Hub. It was collaboratively developed with inputs from the DUT projects CORPUS, GREEN-INC, TransScale, ECLECTIC, MAINCODE, IntegrateNbS, and Circular Grassroots.